Why Separate Administration can pose threat to India’s sovereignty and foreign relations

RK Sanayaima Singh
Contd from previous issue
In a memorandum submitted to Union Home Minister Amit Shah, the UNC cautioned that any fragmentation of Naga areas or detrimental effects on the Nagas would have far-reaching consequences, instigating senseless violence among various communities.
Thirdly, In the intricate web of administrative arrangements based on ethnic lines, the demand for a separate administrative setup for the Chin-Kuki-Mizo in Manipur presents a distinct peculiarity when compared to existing models in North East India. Entities like the Bodoland Territorial Council, Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, Jaintia Hills Autonomous District Council, Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council, and Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council have found relative clarity in area demarcation and their respective ethnic groups, resulting in lesser controversy.
However, the case of the Chin-Kuki-Mizo community differs significantly. Their contiguous population straddles the borders of three countries, introducing a complex dynamic that has the potential to shape a broader Pan-Nationalist sentiment. This unique circumstance raises concerns about the gradual emergence of Pan-Nationalism among the Chin-Kuki-Mizo, which could pose unforeseen challenges for India in the future.
The existing administrative setups in North East India, though not without their complexities, have managed to navigate these issues with relative ease due to their lack of cross-border presence. In contrast, the Chin-Kuki-Mizo's geographic distribution across multiple Nations adds an additional layer of complexity to the equation. The demand for a separate homeland arrangement for this group requires careful consideration, as it could pave the way for a growing sense of Pan-Nationalism, potentially shaping the future landscape in ways that India must be prepared to address.
Fourthly, any recognition of a separate homeland for the Chin-Kuki-Mizo community would reverberate internationally, causing significant ramifications. This move by the Government of India would undoubtedly strain relations with Myanmar and Bangladesh, as these Nations are already grappling with armed militancy originating from Chin-Kuki-Mizo ethnic groups within their territories.
In light of these multifaceted implications, it is imperative for the Indian Government to tread cautiously, considering the broader ramifications on Manipur's stability, India's relations with neighbouring countries, and the potential for future conflicts arising from ethnic separatism. A measured and balanced approach, fostering inclusive dialogue and addressing underlying grievances, may offer a more sustainable path towards peace, unity, and harmonious coexistence for all ethnic communities involved.


(Writer’s note-This piece first appeared in India Today NE.
The opinion piece initially appeared in INDIATODAY N-E on June 26, 2023. The corresponding web link is provided below. This opinion aims to provide insights into the challenges and complexities surrounding the demands for separate administration and homeland in Manipur. The ethnic clashes in Manipur have been a recurring issue, and understanding the underlying causes and implications is crucial for promoting peace and harmony in the region. This article delves into the historical and political factors contributing to these clashes, with a specific focus on the demands for separate administration and homeland put forth by the Kuki community.
By exploring the intricate dynamics of these demands, the article aims to shed light on the complexities faced by Manipur in addressing the aspirations and concerns of different ethnic communities. Additionally, the opinion write-up discusses the potential implications and the broader impact of meeting or not meeting these demands, both for Manipur and India as a whole.)