The necessity of peace in Manipur amidst the ongoing violence
|
Revd Dr MK Koshilning Maring
As an advocate for peace, I pen this article with a focus on reinstating peace and harmony within the State by cultivating love and compassion amongst one another, rather than being guided by subjective opinions or personal viewpoints based on one’s personal ethnic background. The intention of this article is not to insult or offend any community. The basis of this article is the ongoing situation in Manipur, with an emphasis on fostering peace instead of engaging in blame attribution based on claims. Let’s focus on achieving peace first, regardless of individual perspectives.
Who are the leaders in scenarios characterized by conflict and violence ? Leaders are peacemakers, not peacetakers.
Not only the National and State news but also global news outlets frequently focus on conflict and aggression worldwide, making it challenging to find tranquility on the planet. Why do humans prefer strife over serenity ? The current situation brings Satan satisfaction, while God is filled with indignation. The Bible says in Ecclesiastes 3:1 and 8, “For everything there is a season, a time for every activity under heaven.... A time for war and a time for peace.” Absolutely, time brings everything that is what it is. However, it is the duty of human beings to manage the situation. Regardless of religious affiliation, tribe, or caste, many individuals nowadays are driven to conflict due to Satan’s in- fluence and blinded minds, despite outwardly professing religiosity. Satan revels in humanity’s hypocritical actions in the name of God.
Plato posits that inadequate education and extreme poverty are the root causes of crime and violence, as uneducated indivi- duals often resort to violent means to survive or fulfill their desires. From a psychological standpoint, his belief may be valid, however in my belief the primary source of discord and aggression stems from individual ego. Ego acts as a formidable adversary to affection and harmony. In human life, ego has no place in friendships. It is incapable of adjusting with others and acts like a virus that ruins the entire persona. Is it not the ego of certain leaders that sparked communal violence in Manipur? Whenever some undesirable incidents occur amongst individuals from the Meitei, Naga, and Kuki communities, it is incumbent upon the community leaders who triggered communal violence in Manipur to take responsibility. Do the leaders of the Meitei, Naga, and Kuki communities act as genuine peacemakers or merely as peacetakers, and if they are indeed peacemakers, what factors contribute to the persistence of violence ? Why does violence continue to happen under their leadership ? Who is to blame ? Was the Central Government responsible for inciting communal conflicts in Manipur by playing geopolitical music and letting the Manipur communities dance to fulfil the aim of geopolitics ? Undoubtedly, the Central Government understands the North East, particularly Manipur, as the biggest obstacle to overcome in order to achieve its Act East Policy ambitions.
The conflict between the Kukis and Meiteis and between the Kukis and Nagas in Manipur has reached a critical point where Government intervention seems ineffective. The leaders appear unable to effectively manage the crisis, clearly overwhelmed by the violence. Various organizations and notable individuals have expressed concern on social media, but their messages often confuse fact with fiction. Instead of fostering peace and unity, these platforms are often used to fuel discord. Some individuals seem more focused on intensifying the conflict through their statements and videos, underscoring the need for effective crisis management. During this conflict, a number of people are waging war over social media, which is not only ridiculous but also heightens violent behavior. Most users on social media tend to showcase negativity rather than spread positivity, peace, and harmony. They cannot be regarded as lovers or makers of peace. Most individuals are not aware of the proper usage of social media.
What advantages does waging war bring to a specific community ? Nothing. Meiteis, Magas, and Kukis are all theistic communities. The majority of Meiteis adhere to Hinduism, whereas the Nagas and Kukis widely follow Christianity. Do Hinduism and Christianity promote violence ? They do not. Instead, both religions stress the importance of Ahimsa (non-violence), a philosophy also championed by the peace-loving Mahatma Gandhi. Before responding to this inquiry, it is essential to acknowledge one’s religious affiliation and moral principles. Currently, communal conflicts arise between adherents of Hinduism and Christianity in Manipur. Do the Sruti and Smriti scriptures in Hinduism instruct followers to engage in warfare against other communities ? Does the Christian Bible advocate combat against other groups ? Undoubtedly not ! Both religions emphasize profound moral teachings that promote loving one another and coexisting peacefully, regardless of caste, color, or creed. If we hold our religious teachings in higher esteem than our ideological tenets, then our moral lives should be guided by religious doctrines rather than by efforts to dominate and control the rights and possessions of others. Hinduism teaches universal love by encouraging adherents to view every living being as a manifestation of the divine. Rather than an exclusive commandment, the concept is framed as spiritual oneness, where loving others is treated as the highest form of duty, compassion, and devotion.
Chapter 6, Verse 32, and chapter 12, verse 13 of the Bhagavad Gita state that those who are free from malice and are friendly and compassionate toward all living beings are very dear to him. In the Vedas, ancient texts advocate for practicing Maitri, or loving-kindness and generous compassion, toward all forms of life. The Christian Bible also teaches clearly how to love one another for peace and harmony in living together. The scripture says in 1 John 4:16, “So we have come to know and believe the love that God has for us. God is love, and whoever abides in love abides in God, and God abides in him.” Again, verse 8 says, “Anyone who does not love does not know God, because God is love.” John 13:34-35: “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this, all will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.” John 15:12: “My command is this: Love each other as I have loved you.” 1 John 4:7: “Dear friends, let us love one another, for love comes from God. Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God.” Romans 13:8: “Let no debt remain outstanding, except the continuing debt to love one another, for whoever loves others has fulfilled the law.” 1 Peter 4:8: “Above all, love each other deeply, because love covers a multitude of sins.” 1 Corinthians 13:13: “So now faith, hope, and love abide, these three; but the greatest of these is love.” If the Meiteis, Nagas, and Kukis cannot uphold peace according to their religious tenets, then what does adherence to that religion signify ? Every person should uphold peace.
What lies at the heart of Manipur’s ongoing conflict? Accounts from the Kuki, Meitei, and Naga communities appear to blame one another, highlighting the need for clarity on the conflict’s underlying causes. It is also being asked by the Meiteis and Nagas why the Kukis sought Separate Administration from the Central Government. Conversely, the Kukis should reflect on why their demand for Separate Administration is resisted by the Meiteis and Nagas. Don’t these questions deserve consideration to grasp the facts and bring about peace ? Will ongoing conflicts successfully achieve the objectives of a separate Kuki administrative unit ? If successful, will peace prevail and violence cease to exist among the Kuki communities ? Will the Naga and Meitei communities concur with this demand ? Will the demand for Separate Administration impact Nagalim and Kangleipak, and could it lead to peace or further violence? Can the pursuit of sovereignty for Kangleipak and Nagalim lead to a mutually beneficial solution for all communities in Manipur, or will it instead exacerbate tensions ? Indeed, they certainly have their own self-determination hopes, irrespective of whether other brothers concur or not. If we know that the Central Government is the primary driver behind the breakdown of the Naga National movement, wouldn’t the Kuki community be adversely affected ? It is essential to have a forward-thinking approach regarding their future and understand the Government of India’s stance on the Kuki communities’ future.
Recognizing historical facts is crucial for achieving peace and stability in the region. Will the Kukis continue to play violence until a Separate Administration is established, and is this violence in line with Christian teachings ? Has the assassination of both Kuki and Naga religious leaders achieved peace and fulfilled their demands ? Not at all. Instead, it has intensified tensions between the two communities. The manipulation of historical origins of Kangleipak and Naga is also a factor fueling the current conflict. Identifying the genuine reasons behind these inter-communal tensions is crucial. Achieving a consensus on the conflict’s roots requires these communities to approach the issue with sincerity. Without this, efforts to find a solution will be as futile as attempting to suffocate fire with a blanket. Was this war a calculated move ? Did individual problems get manipulated into broader communal conflicts ? What political tactics aim to exert control by dividing communities ? The key to resolving the conflict in Manipur lies in prioritizing peace and harmony, irrespective of who instigated and started the violence. A spiritual or religious perspective is essential for initiating peace, whereas a secular approach may prove counterproductive due to biased arguments. One should prioritize Christ’s teachings over violence.
Since May 2023, Manipur has been marred by violence, prompting appeals for peace and harmony among its multi-ethnic population. Where is peace now ? Has peace been replaced by violence ? Do we enjoy peace within violence and war ? Absolutely not. The current situation is characterized by strife, raising questions about the viability of these appeals. Rather than engaging in armed conflict, the Meiteis, Nagas, and Kukis should negotiate to resolve their differences. The ongoing violence necessitates an immediate cessation of hostilities. The complexity of Manipur’s geopolitics raises questions. Can the Government of India entertain the demands of Meitei Kangleipak, the Nagas for Greater Nagalim, and the Kukis for a Separate Administration ? Peace is essential for resolving these issues; without it, a resolution seems unattainable. Responsible leaders from the Central Government, Naga, and Kuki communities must collaborate to identify a starting point of peace negotiations to address the ongoing conflicts in Manipur. True peace originates within ourselves, rather than being imposed by external authorities or law and order. This internal peace stems from the love that resides within our hearts. Recognizing our shared human nature and the brevity of life should inspire us to live in harmony, free from animosity. Is our fleeting existence, akin to a flower that blooms briefly, not worthy of love?
Observing the violence in Manipur, it is clear that peace is needed from both outer and inner approaches. From an outer perspective, Immanuel Kant, in his essay ‘Perpetual Peace,’ argued that global peace can be achieved through the spread of universal human rights, constitutional republics, and international cooperation. Can we bring peace to Manipur through global agents and universal human rights, or does it lie in the hands of national and state governments? Through mutual understanding third person’s role can achieve peace. And from an inner peace perspective, like Stoicism is required. Philosophers like Epictetus argue that inner peace is achieved by mastering one’s own desires and reactions, finding tranquility regardless of external chaos or conflict. This is also possible through a level of understanding. Or do we need integrative peace, which believes that macro-level societal harmony and micro-level individual peace are interdependent.
An individual devoid of love and forgiveness indicates a lack of self-awareness and understanding of their own life, demonstrating a narrow perspective that views others as fundamentally different. Practicing harmonious living is essential for all communities in Manipur daily life. A stable peace is the cornerstone of a prosperous society, fostering economic growth, protecting basic human rights, and ensuring security, which in turn enables communities to channel resources toward development rather than conflict mitigation. The prevailing conflicts in the Manipur region necessitate peace to mitigate their adverse effects on children’s education and everyone’s livelihoods, which could lead to severe future repercussions if left unaddressed. Current leaders and adults in prominent positions should consider not only the benefits of the present but also the potential consequences for the future. Leaders should be capable of understanding the value of peace in Manipur, regardless of community affiliations.
Leaders who lack this understanding are not fit for their roles and may be prioritizing personal gains, which could have detrimental effects on future generations and leadership. All responsible leaders of Manipur’s different communities ought to be promoters of peace, serving as peacekeepers and peacemakers, not merely beneficiaries of peace or peacetakers. Mattie J.T. Stepanek said “Choose to make peace a habit. Live it! Think peaceful thoughts, say peaceful words, live peaceful actions. Be a peace maker.” Peace must be fundamental to leaders to avert violence. A leader’s decisions and policies greatly impact community living. Love of peace reflects God’s will, and violence embodies Satan’s desire. Leaders of Meitei, Naga, and Kuki, which path do you choose? It’s crucial that all stakeholders resolve to engage in simultaneous table talks, rather than waiting for one community to ask for peace first. The current era demands peace, not war. Jesus’ teachings emphasize, “Blessed are the peacemakers” (Matthew 5:9); similarly, may peace prevail in Manipur, fostering a sense of brotherhood among us in God’s love.
The writer is a Pastor and former Academic Dean at Chil Global University, can be reached via email at [email protected]
As an advocate for peace, I pen this article with a focus on reinstating peace and harmony within the State by cultivating love and compassion amongst one another, rather than being guided by subjective opinions or personal viewpoints based on one’s personal ethnic background. The intention of this article is not to insult or offend any community. The basis of this article is the ongoing situation in Manipur, with an emphasis on fostering peace instead of engaging in blame attribution based on claims. Let’s focus on achieving peace first, regardless of individual perspectives.
Who are the leaders in scenarios characterized by conflict and violence ? Leaders are peacemakers, not peacetakers.
Not only the National and State news but also global news outlets frequently focus on conflict and aggression worldwide, making it challenging to find tranquility on the planet. Why do humans prefer strife over serenity ? The current situation brings Satan satisfaction, while God is filled with indignation. The Bible says in Ecclesiastes 3:1 and 8, “For everything there is a season, a time for every activity under heaven.... A time for war and a time for peace.” Absolutely, time brings everything that is what it is. However, it is the duty of human beings to manage the situation. Regardless of religious affiliation, tribe, or caste, many individuals nowadays are driven to conflict due to Satan’s in- fluence and blinded minds, despite outwardly professing religiosity. Satan revels in humanity’s hypocritical actions in the name of God.
Plato posits that inadequate education and extreme poverty are the root causes of crime and violence, as uneducated indivi- duals often resort to violent means to survive or fulfill their desires. From a psychological standpoint, his belief may be valid, however in my belief the primary source of discord and aggression stems from individual ego. Ego acts as a formidable adversary to affection and harmony. In human life, ego has no place in friendships. It is incapable of adjusting with others and acts like a virus that ruins the entire persona. Is it not the ego of certain leaders that sparked communal violence in Manipur? Whenever some undesirable incidents occur amongst individuals from the Meitei, Naga, and Kuki communities, it is incumbent upon the community leaders who triggered communal violence in Manipur to take responsibility. Do the leaders of the Meitei, Naga, and Kuki communities act as genuine peacemakers or merely as peacetakers, and if they are indeed peacemakers, what factors contribute to the persistence of violence ? Why does violence continue to happen under their leadership ? Who is to blame ? Was the Central Government responsible for inciting communal conflicts in Manipur by playing geopolitical music and letting the Manipur communities dance to fulfil the aim of geopolitics ? Undoubtedly, the Central Government understands the North East, particularly Manipur, as the biggest obstacle to overcome in order to achieve its Act East Policy ambitions.
The conflict between the Kukis and Meiteis and between the Kukis and Nagas in Manipur has reached a critical point where Government intervention seems ineffective. The leaders appear unable to effectively manage the crisis, clearly overwhelmed by the violence. Various organizations and notable individuals have expressed concern on social media, but their messages often confuse fact with fiction. Instead of fostering peace and unity, these platforms are often used to fuel discord. Some individuals seem more focused on intensifying the conflict through their statements and videos, underscoring the need for effective crisis management. During this conflict, a number of people are waging war over social media, which is not only ridiculous but also heightens violent behavior. Most users on social media tend to showcase negativity rather than spread positivity, peace, and harmony. They cannot be regarded as lovers or makers of peace. Most individuals are not aware of the proper usage of social media.
What advantages does waging war bring to a specific community ? Nothing. Meiteis, Magas, and Kukis are all theistic communities. The majority of Meiteis adhere to Hinduism, whereas the Nagas and Kukis widely follow Christianity. Do Hinduism and Christianity promote violence ? They do not. Instead, both religions stress the importance of Ahimsa (non-violence), a philosophy also championed by the peace-loving Mahatma Gandhi. Before responding to this inquiry, it is essential to acknowledge one’s religious affiliation and moral principles. Currently, communal conflicts arise between adherents of Hinduism and Christianity in Manipur. Do the Sruti and Smriti scriptures in Hinduism instruct followers to engage in warfare against other communities ? Does the Christian Bible advocate combat against other groups ? Undoubtedly not ! Both religions emphasize profound moral teachings that promote loving one another and coexisting peacefully, regardless of caste, color, or creed. If we hold our religious teachings in higher esteem than our ideological tenets, then our moral lives should be guided by religious doctrines rather than by efforts to dominate and control the rights and possessions of others. Hinduism teaches universal love by encouraging adherents to view every living being as a manifestation of the divine. Rather than an exclusive commandment, the concept is framed as spiritual oneness, where loving others is treated as the highest form of duty, compassion, and devotion.
Chapter 6, Verse 32, and chapter 12, verse 13 of the Bhagavad Gita state that those who are free from malice and are friendly and compassionate toward all living beings are very dear to him. In the Vedas, ancient texts advocate for practicing Maitri, or loving-kindness and generous compassion, toward all forms of life. The Christian Bible also teaches clearly how to love one another for peace and harmony in living together. The scripture says in 1 John 4:16, “So we have come to know and believe the love that God has for us. God is love, and whoever abides in love abides in God, and God abides in him.” Again, verse 8 says, “Anyone who does not love does not know God, because God is love.” John 13:34-35: “A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this, all will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.” John 15:12: “My command is this: Love each other as I have loved you.” 1 John 4:7: “Dear friends, let us love one another, for love comes from God. Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God.” Romans 13:8: “Let no debt remain outstanding, except the continuing debt to love one another, for whoever loves others has fulfilled the law.” 1 Peter 4:8: “Above all, love each other deeply, because love covers a multitude of sins.” 1 Corinthians 13:13: “So now faith, hope, and love abide, these three; but the greatest of these is love.” If the Meiteis, Nagas, and Kukis cannot uphold peace according to their religious tenets, then what does adherence to that religion signify ? Every person should uphold peace.
What lies at the heart of Manipur’s ongoing conflict? Accounts from the Kuki, Meitei, and Naga communities appear to blame one another, highlighting the need for clarity on the conflict’s underlying causes. It is also being asked by the Meiteis and Nagas why the Kukis sought Separate Administration from the Central Government. Conversely, the Kukis should reflect on why their demand for Separate Administration is resisted by the Meiteis and Nagas. Don’t these questions deserve consideration to grasp the facts and bring about peace ? Will ongoing conflicts successfully achieve the objectives of a separate Kuki administrative unit ? If successful, will peace prevail and violence cease to exist among the Kuki communities ? Will the Naga and Meitei communities concur with this demand ? Will the demand for Separate Administration impact Nagalim and Kangleipak, and could it lead to peace or further violence? Can the pursuit of sovereignty for Kangleipak and Nagalim lead to a mutually beneficial solution for all communities in Manipur, or will it instead exacerbate tensions ? Indeed, they certainly have their own self-determination hopes, irrespective of whether other brothers concur or not. If we know that the Central Government is the primary driver behind the breakdown of the Naga National movement, wouldn’t the Kuki community be adversely affected ? It is essential to have a forward-thinking approach regarding their future and understand the Government of India’s stance on the Kuki communities’ future.
Recognizing historical facts is crucial for achieving peace and stability in the region. Will the Kukis continue to play violence until a Separate Administration is established, and is this violence in line with Christian teachings ? Has the assassination of both Kuki and Naga religious leaders achieved peace and fulfilled their demands ? Not at all. Instead, it has intensified tensions between the two communities. The manipulation of historical origins of Kangleipak and Naga is also a factor fueling the current conflict. Identifying the genuine reasons behind these inter-communal tensions is crucial. Achieving a consensus on the conflict’s roots requires these communities to approach the issue with sincerity. Without this, efforts to find a solution will be as futile as attempting to suffocate fire with a blanket. Was this war a calculated move ? Did individual problems get manipulated into broader communal conflicts ? What political tactics aim to exert control by dividing communities ? The key to resolving the conflict in Manipur lies in prioritizing peace and harmony, irrespective of who instigated and started the violence. A spiritual or religious perspective is essential for initiating peace, whereas a secular approach may prove counterproductive due to biased arguments. One should prioritize Christ’s teachings over violence.
Since May 2023, Manipur has been marred by violence, prompting appeals for peace and harmony among its multi-ethnic population. Where is peace now ? Has peace been replaced by violence ? Do we enjoy peace within violence and war ? Absolutely not. The current situation is characterized by strife, raising questions about the viability of these appeals. Rather than engaging in armed conflict, the Meiteis, Nagas, and Kukis should negotiate to resolve their differences. The ongoing violence necessitates an immediate cessation of hostilities. The complexity of Manipur’s geopolitics raises questions. Can the Government of India entertain the demands of Meitei Kangleipak, the Nagas for Greater Nagalim, and the Kukis for a Separate Administration ? Peace is essential for resolving these issues; without it, a resolution seems unattainable. Responsible leaders from the Central Government, Naga, and Kuki communities must collaborate to identify a starting point of peace negotiations to address the ongoing conflicts in Manipur. True peace originates within ourselves, rather than being imposed by external authorities or law and order. This internal peace stems from the love that resides within our hearts. Recognizing our shared human nature and the brevity of life should inspire us to live in harmony, free from animosity. Is our fleeting existence, akin to a flower that blooms briefly, not worthy of love?
Observing the violence in Manipur, it is clear that peace is needed from both outer and inner approaches. From an outer perspective, Immanuel Kant, in his essay ‘Perpetual Peace,’ argued that global peace can be achieved through the spread of universal human rights, constitutional republics, and international cooperation. Can we bring peace to Manipur through global agents and universal human rights, or does it lie in the hands of national and state governments? Through mutual understanding third person’s role can achieve peace. And from an inner peace perspective, like Stoicism is required. Philosophers like Epictetus argue that inner peace is achieved by mastering one’s own desires and reactions, finding tranquility regardless of external chaos or conflict. This is also possible through a level of understanding. Or do we need integrative peace, which believes that macro-level societal harmony and micro-level individual peace are interdependent.
An individual devoid of love and forgiveness indicates a lack of self-awareness and understanding of their own life, demonstrating a narrow perspective that views others as fundamentally different. Practicing harmonious living is essential for all communities in Manipur daily life. A stable peace is the cornerstone of a prosperous society, fostering economic growth, protecting basic human rights, and ensuring security, which in turn enables communities to channel resources toward development rather than conflict mitigation. The prevailing conflicts in the Manipur region necessitate peace to mitigate their adverse effects on children’s education and everyone’s livelihoods, which could lead to severe future repercussions if left unaddressed. Current leaders and adults in prominent positions should consider not only the benefits of the present but also the potential consequences for the future. Leaders should be capable of understanding the value of peace in Manipur, regardless of community affiliations.
Leaders who lack this understanding are not fit for their roles and may be prioritizing personal gains, which could have detrimental effects on future generations and leadership. All responsible leaders of Manipur’s different communities ought to be promoters of peace, serving as peacekeepers and peacemakers, not merely beneficiaries of peace or peacetakers. Mattie J.T. Stepanek said “Choose to make peace a habit. Live it! Think peaceful thoughts, say peaceful words, live peaceful actions. Be a peace maker.” Peace must be fundamental to leaders to avert violence. A leader’s decisions and policies greatly impact community living. Love of peace reflects God’s will, and violence embodies Satan’s desire. Leaders of Meitei, Naga, and Kuki, which path do you choose? It’s crucial that all stakeholders resolve to engage in simultaneous table talks, rather than waiting for one community to ask for peace first. The current era demands peace, not war. Jesus’ teachings emphasize, “Blessed are the peacemakers” (Matthew 5:9); similarly, may peace prevail in Manipur, fostering a sense of brotherhood among us in God’s love.
The writer is a Pastor and former Academic Dean at Chil Global University, can be reached via email at [email protected]