Dipak Kurmi
In recent days, the security situation in Manipur has taken a concerning turn, with authorities taking the unprecedented step of calling out a piece of fake news circulating in the region. The rumor claimed that 900 militants from neighboring Myanmar had crossed into the State, a falsehood that was initially believed even by senior political executives. Such a large-scale movement of militants should have left substantial evidence, from the need for dozens of off-roader vehicles to the telltale signs of border crossings, yet none were found. Despite the lack of concrete evidence, this story reflects a larger issue: in conflict zones like Manipur, rumors can quickly become self-evident truths, further complicating an already fragile situation.
Tensions Between Meiteis and Kuki-Zo Tribes
Manipur’s crisis is deeply rooted in ethnic tensions between the majority Meitei community, which dominates the Imphal Valley, and the Kuki-Zo tribes, who primarily inhabit the highland districts. Since the outbreak of violence in May 2023, the conflict has claimed at least 217 lives, including unarmed civilians, with attacks driven by both real and imagined slights. Skirmishes and territorial clashes have become common as both communities seek to secure their position ahead of any potential peace accord brokered by the Central Government.
As autumn approached, the conflict escalated dramatically. Not only did the frequency of attacks and fatalities rise, but a new dimension of warfare was introduced — the use of drones to target rivals. This technology, reportedly sourced from Chinese-manufactured components and possibly assembled locally, has been in use in neighboring Myanmar, where rebel groups have waged a successful guerrilla war against regular troops. The porous and difficult-to-police border between Manipur and Myanmar facilitated the introduction of this technology, adding a new headache for Indian authorities tasked with restoring peace in the region.
Ethnic Boundaries and the Struggle for Territory
One of the main reasons for the intensification of violence is the looming prospect of ethnic boundaries being drawn as part of any peace settlement. Both the Meitei and Kuki-Zo communities are vying to control mixed or buffer areas, hoping to secure territorial advantages in any new political arrangement. This competition has made an already volatile situation even more complex, as both sides seek to expand their influence in preparation for the future.
The weapons used in this conflict are a mix of sophisticated and rudimentary arms sourced from various regions, including India, Myanmar, China, the US, Russia, and even Europe. From AK-47s to rockets, the array of munitions being employed underscores the severity of the conflict. Despite the scale of violence, the number of combatants and weapons is not insurmountable, suggesting that with a concerted effort, the conflict could be contained and peace restored. However, the State Government’s inability to quell the violence raises serious concerns about its capacity to govern effectively.
State Government’s Struggles and Biases
The Meitei-dominated Manipur State Government and its police force have faced widespread criticism for their handling of the crisis. Over the past two years, the Government has failed to build trust among the minority tribal communities, leaving the State deeply divided along ethnic lines. The police, too, have been accused of parochial biases, particularly in their operations outside the Imphal Valley, further eroding confidence in their ability to act as neutral arbiters in the conflict.
Moreover, internal dissent within the State Government has exacerbated the situation. Factions within the ruling party have adopted increasingly hardline stances, making it more difficult to reach a peaceful settlement with the Kuki-Zo tribes. The Government’s recent push to end the existing peace agreement with surrendered Kuki militant groups is particularly alarming. If this agreement were to be terminated, scores of hardened militants currently living in camps under the supervision of the Indian Army would be set loose, likely escalating the conflict even further.
The Central Government’s Role
The Central Government, recognizing the gravity of the situation, has initiated secretive “hush-hush talks” with various stakeholders in an attempt to broker peace. However, these efforts have been hampered by the State Government’s inability to maintain a balanced approach that satisfies both the Meitei majority and the minority tribal communities. Given the State Government’s ineffectiveness, many observers believe that the time has come for the Central Government to take a more direct role in resolving the crisis.
One possible solution would be for the Central Government to sideline the State administration, either by asking it to remain silent on the conflict or by imposing President’s Rule in Manipur. While this would undoubtedly be a drastic step, it may be necessary to prevent further chaos in this strategically important border State. Manipur’s location at the intersection of India, Myanmar, and Bangladesh makes it a key geopolitical player in the region, and continued instability could have far-reaching consequences.
Regional Geopolitics and the Threat of Escalation
The Kuki-Zo tribes in Manipur are part of a larger ethnic group, the Zomi, which includes the Kuki, Paite, and Hmar tribes of Manipur, as well as the Mizos of Mizoram and tribes in Myanmar’s Kachin and Chin provinces. The Kachin and Chin rebels in Myanmar have enjoyed considerable success in their battle against the military junta, gaining control of significant territory and arms caches in the process. There is a real risk that these weapons and fighters could be funneled into Manipur, prolonging the conflict and turning the State into a new front in the region’s ongoing insurgencies.
Additionally, the political situation in neighboring Bangladesh could further complicate matters. A regime change in Dhaka could see the re-emergence of North Eastern Indian rebel groups finding safe havens in Bangladesh’s Chittagong Hill Tracts or in the tea gardens of Srimangal and Sylhet, both of which have been used as insurgent bases in the past. This potential for regional destabilization makes it all the more urgent for India to resolve the crisis in Manipur and present a united front in the North East.
A Call for Political Sagacity
The situation in Manipur is a stark reminder of the challenges facing India’s North Eastern States. Ethnic tensions, insurgencies, and external influences have created a volatile mix that requires a nuanced and multifaceted approach. The Central Government must act with both political sagacity and tactical diplomacy to bring peace to Manipur. This will require not only addressing the immediate conflict between the Meiteis and Kuki-Zo tribes but also tackling the underlying socio-political and economic issues that fuel unrest in the region.
The loss of a Government is a small price to pay compared to the cost of continued chaos in a vital border State. India’s leadership must prioritize stability in the North East, working to douse the many local fires that threaten to engulf the region. Only by fostering a sense of unity and shared purpose can the country ensure that external forces do not exploit the region’s divisions for their own gain.
The time for action is now. With the situation in Manipur rapidly deteriorating, the Central Government must step in decisively to prevent further bloodshed and pave the way for a lasting peace. Only through a combination of strong leadership, diplomatic engagement, and regional cooperation can India hope to restore stability to its North Eastern frontier.
(The writer can be reached at
[email protected])